Am deschis grupe noi Abheda Yoga Tradițională în
📍 București, 📍 Iași (din 7 oct) și 🌐 ONLINE!
Înscrierile sunt posibile doar o perioadă limitată!
Te invităm pe canalele noastre:
📲 Telegram –
https://t.me/yogaromania
📲 WhatsApp –
https://chat.whatsapp.com/ChjOPg8m93KANaGJ42DuBt
Dacă spiritualitatea, bunătatea și transformarea fac parte din căutarea ta,
atunci 💠 hai în comunitatea Abheda! 💠
Those who say that the Codex Alimentarius was designed “for consumer protection” and is “harmless” should know that it is not a package of laws, but a body that adopts recommendations in the field of food, such as food labeling.
Created in 1962, as a measure to protect and control the food trade, the Codex has remained a subject of dispute to this day, considered by many specialists and politicians around the world as a way to control the food industry.
Since its adoption until now, this body has been the subject of numerous protests and even lawsuits that have tried to annul internationally adopted food standards.
Why is the Codex Alimentarius so blamed?
First of all, because all types of alternative medicine – herbal food supplements, natural therapies and even vitamins – will be outlawed.
Following its application, any nation that does not apply this normative act will face major economic sanctions, since it will automatically lose any dispute with a country that complies with its provisions, according to a document from the World Health Organization (WHO).
Pharmaceutical companies, in the fight for survival
From the data provided by the WHO on the organisation of the ‘Codex Alimenarius’ Commission, it appears that it is composed of two subcommittees that analyse the impact of nutrition programmes on the health of the population. One of them, the “Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses” (CCNFSDU), is headed by Dr. Rolf Grossklaus.
He is also the owner of the risk assessment company “Federal Institute for Risk Estimation in Germany”, which advises the CCNFSDU on the impact that nutrients have on people taking dietary supplements.
Grossklaus believes that “nutrition is not relevant to health”. As absurd as it may seem, the doctor declared in 1994 that nutrients are nothing more than toxins and decided to set up a risk assessment commission.
Thus, it ends up that, at least at the level of normative act, all herbal products used in alternative medicine are outlawed, and if some of them are kept on the market, the quantities in which they will be sold will be very small and issued only on prescription.
“The fight between the remedies of natural medicine, which is a complementary medical act, not alternative, goes to the basement of the money from the big pharmaceutical companies”, says Prof. Dr. Gheorghe Mencinicopschi, director of the Food Research Institute. Thus, he continues, the chemical-pharmaceutical industry tries to “confiscate” certain natural remedies that are later relaunched on the market in the form of much more expensive drugs.
It is known that aspirin, initially, was a natural product obtained from willow bark and was called salicylic acid. Pharmaceutical companies have “adopted” it, added acetyl to its composition, relaunching it on the market in the form of a much more expensive drug.
CAN WE OPPOSE THIS ALIMENTARIUS CODE?
DO WE HAVE THE MIJOACELE AND THE POWER TO STOP THE TRAMPLING OF THE RIGHTS TO DECIDE HOW AND WITH WHAT WE FEED OURSELVES?